by Sue Frost
I often consider the age-old concept of “the carrot and the stick,” which embodies the
balance between enforcement and support—a theme that frequently comes up in
discussions about how we govern and regulate the homeless community. This balance is
crucial but often mishandled by government policies. The City of Grants Pass v. Johnson
case, recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court, marks a pivotal moment in our
approach to homelessness. It prompts us to reevaluate the effectiveness of past policies
that have, in many ways, worsened the problem rather than solved it.
For too long, court rulings like the 2018 decision in Martin v. Boise have handcuffed
local governments, preventing them from enforcing anti-camping ordinances that are
essential for maintaining public order and safety. These legal constraints have allowed
encampments to proliferate, contributing to crime, environmental damage, and public
health crises, including the spread of diseases and increased drug overdoses right on our
streets.
The oral arguments at the Supreme Court indicate a potential shift that could empower
local authorities to regain control over this spiraling issue. If the Court sides with Grants
Pass, it could mark an end to the era where local officials’ hands are tied by overly
permissive legal interpretations. This change is crucial; it’s about restoring the rule of law
in our communities while addressing the humanitarian crisis of homelessness with more
than just temporary fixes.
Some politicians and their activist allies argue that enforcing anti-camping laws is
inhumane for those without alternatives. Yet, this view overlooks the true cruelty of
letting people live in dangerous and unhealthy conditions. It’s not merely about clearing
tents from the streets; it’s about eliminating obstacles to more effective solutions,
including mental health services, addiction treatment, and suitable housing for our most
vulnerable residents.
The harsh reality is that the current approach has not only failed our homeless population,
it has also ignored the rights and needs of the broader community. Residents and
businesses bear the brunt of the consequences, from depreciating property values to
safety concerns. It’s clear that a shift towards more balanced policies is overdue. We need
policies that ensure compassion does not cripple our communities, but rather strengthens
them.
As we await the Supreme Court’s decision, which is expected in June, it’s time for local
leaders to prepare to act decisively. We should be ready to implement a dual approach
that enhances enforcement to clear hazardous encampments and increases support
through proven rehabilitation and mental health programs. This isn’t just about taking
back control of our streets; it’s about taking responsible steps to provide real solutions
that address both the symptoms and root causes of homelessness.
Thank you for Reading – and as always if you want to contact me, call me at 916-874-
5491, or e-mail me at SupervisorFrost@saccounty.gov. Sacramento County Supervisor
Sue Frost represents the 4th District, which includes the communities of Citrus Heights,
Folsom, Orangevale, Antelope, North Highlands, Rio Linda, Elverta, and Rancho
Murieta.
